Strayer v. Gillespie ex rel. Cosmen

177 Ill. App. 97, 1913 Ill. App. LEXIS 1144
CourtAppellate Court of Illinois
DecidedJanuary 28, 1913
DocketGen. No. 17,866
StatusPublished

This text of 177 Ill. App. 97 (Strayer v. Gillespie ex rel. Cosmen) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Court of Illinois primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Strayer v. Gillespie ex rel. Cosmen, 177 Ill. App. 97, 1913 Ill. App. LEXIS 1144 (Ill. Ct. App. 1913).

Opinion

Mr. Justice Barnes

delivered the opinion of the court.

Judgment in this case was rendered against the defendant, Gillespie, as garnishee in a garnishment proceeding. An appeal was prayed by him and allowed. No appeal bond was filed by him, but a bond appears in the record given by the wrong party and to the wrong party. The bond is by one Gilliek, not a party to -the suit, and runs to Gillespie against whom judgment was given. Manifestly the appeal not having been taken by the party to whom the right was given it must be dismissed. Propeller Niagara v. Martin, 42 Ill. 106; Tedrick v. Wells, 152 Ill. 214; Union Nat. Bank of Chicago v. Barth, 179 Ill. 83.

Appeal dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Propeller Niagara v. Martin
42 Ill. 106 (Illinois Supreme Court, 1866)
Tedrick ex rel. Ruffner v. Wells
152 Ill. 214 (Illinois Supreme Court, 1894)
Union National Bank v. Barth
53 N.E. 615 (Illinois Supreme Court, 1899)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
177 Ill. App. 97, 1913 Ill. App. LEXIS 1144, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/strayer-v-gillespie-ex-rel-cosmen-illappct-1913.