Strax v. Granoff & Walker

160 Misc. 2d 85, 612 N.Y.S.2d 291, 1994 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 159
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York·Decided January 14, 1994·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

Per Curiam.

Order entered March 26, 1993 affirmed with $10 costs.

[86]*86We agree, essentially for reasons stated in the decision of Administrative Judge Silbermann, that the objectionable and frivolous conduct of the plaintiff, an attorney, was sanctionable pursuant to 22 NYCRR part 130. The record demonstrates that plaintiff wrote to two of the defendant law firm’s clients with threats of "further legal action” in the event each did not respond to interrogatories -previously stricken by the court, and this despite language in a prior order of the court cautioning plaintiff that "further improper contacts” with defendant’s clients "might be sanctionable.”

Ostrau, P. J., Miller and Glen, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Strax v. Granoff & Walker, 160 Misc. 2d 85, 612 N.Y.S.2d 291, 1994 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 159 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1994).

160 Misc. 2d 85 (Strax v. Granoff & Walker) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Strax v. Granoff & Walker
227 A.D.2d 252 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1996)