Strax v. Granoff & Walker

160 Misc. 2d 85, 612 N.Y.S.2d 291, 1994 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 159
CourtAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York
DecidedJanuary 14, 1994
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 160 Misc. 2d 85 (Strax v. Granoff & Walker) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Strax v. Granoff & Walker, 160 Misc. 2d 85, 612 N.Y.S.2d 291, 1994 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 159 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1994).

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

Per Curiam.

Order entered March 26, 1993 affirmed with $10 costs.

[86]*86We agree, essentially for reasons stated in the decision of Administrative Judge Silbermann, that the objectionable and frivolous conduct of the plaintiff, an attorney, was sanctionable pursuant to 22 NYCRR part 130. The record demonstrates that plaintiff wrote to two of the defendant law firm’s clients with threats of "further legal action” in the event each did not respond to interrogatories -previously stricken by the court, and this despite language in a prior order of the court cautioning plaintiff that "further improper contacts” with defendant’s clients "might be sanctionable.”

Ostrau, P. J., Miller and Glen, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Strax v. Granoff & Walker
227 A.D.2d 252 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1996)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
160 Misc. 2d 85, 612 N.Y.S.2d 291, 1994 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 159, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/strax-v-granoff-walker-nyappterm-1994.