Strawderman v. Swanson

Fourth Circuit

Strawderman v. Swanson

699 F. App'x 226

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided October 23, 2017·No. No. 17-1420·Published

Opinion

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Tony M. Strawderman and Laurie Strawderman appeal from the district court’s order affirming the bankruptcy court’s order approving the sale of property of the bankruptcy estate. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Strawderman v. Swanson, No. 2:16-cv-00232-AWA-DEM (E.D. Va. Mar. 2, 2017). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Tony M. Strawderman and Laurie Strawderman appeal from the district court’s order affirming the bankruptcy court’s order approving the sale of property of the bankruptcy estate. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Strawderman v. Swanson, No. 2:16-cv-00232-AWA-DEM (E.D. Va. Mar. 2, 2017). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Strawderman v. Swanson, 699 F. App'x 226 (4th Cir. 2017).

Pincite

699 F. App'x 226 (Strawderman v. Swanson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.