Strawberry Hill Press, Inc. v. Laddie Boy Dog Foods, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Strawberry Hill Press, Inc. v. Laddie Boy Dog Foods, Inc.

7 A.D.2d 759, 181 N.Y.S.2d 99, 1958 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3708

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 30, 1958

StatusPublished

This text of 7 A.D.2d 759 (Strawberry Hill Press, Inc. v. Laddie Boy Dog Foods, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Strawberry Hill Press, Inc. v. Laddie Boy Dog Foods, Inc., 7 A.D.2d 759, 181 N.Y.S.2d 99, 1958 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3708 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1958).

Pincite

Opinion

In an action to recover damages for breach of contract, and for other relief, wherein the answer asserts a defense and counterclaim based on breach of warranty, the appeal is from an order (1) denying appellant’s motion to strike the case from the calendar on the grounds that respondent has not served a bill of particulars and that appellant has not had an ample opportunity to complete the examination of respondent before trial, and (2) granting respondent’s motion to vacate appellant’s demand for a bill of particulars and notice of examination. Order reversed, with $10 costs and disbursements, appellant’s motion granted, and respondent’s motion denied. In our opinion, the learned Special Term improvidently exercised its discretion in denying appellant’s motion and granting respondent’s motion. Wenzel, Acting P. J., Beldock, Murphy, Hallinan and Kleinfeld, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action to recover damages for breach of contract, and for other relief, wherein the answer asserts a defense and counterclaim based on breach of warranty, the appeal is from an order (1) denying appellant’s motion to strike the case from the calendar on the grounds that respondent has not served a bill of particulars and that appellant has not had an ample opportunity to complete the examination of respondent before trial, and (2) granting respondent’s motion to vacate appellant’s demand for a bill of particulars and notice of examination. Order reversed, with $10 costs and disbursements, appellant’s motion granted, and respondent’s motion denied. In our opinion, the learned Special Term improvidently exercised its discretion in denying appellant’s motion and granting respondent’s motion. Wenzel, Acting P. J., Beldock, Murphy, Hallinan and Kleinfeld, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

7 A.D.2d 759, 181 N.Y.S.2d 99, 1958 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3708, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/strawberry-hill-press-inc-v-laddie-boy-dog-foods-inc-nyappdiv-1958.