Strawberry Growers' Selling Co. v. American Ry. Express Co.

31 F.2d 947, 1929 U.S. App. LEXIS 3603
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
DecidedApril 5, 1929
DocketNo. 5114
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 31 F.2d 947 (Strawberry Growers' Selling Co. v. American Ry. Express Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Strawberry Growers' Selling Co. v. American Ry. Express Co., 31 F.2d 947, 1929 U.S. App. LEXIS 3603 (5th Cir. 1929).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This was a suit to collect an undercharge in express rates upon interstate shipments of strawberries. It was brought more than two years, but less than three years, after the shipments were made.

The defenses were: (1) Prescription of two years under the Louisiana statute; and (2) estoppel, in that appellant had settled with the farmers whom it represented upon-the basis of the rates charged and collected as the shipments were made.

As these were interstate shipments, the state statute of prescription does not apply. Suit within three years from the time the cause of action accrued is authorized by act of Congress. USCA tit. 49, § 16, par. 3(a).

The carrier was bound to collect the legal rate, and a shipper who has paid less cannot invoke the principle of estoppel. Pittsburgh, etc., R. Co. v. Pink, 250 U. S.. 577, 40 S. Ct. 27, 63 L. Ed. 1151.

The judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Sanantex Oil Co. v. Thompson
280 S.W.2d 252 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1955)
Vicksburg, S. & P. Ry. Co. v. Paup
47 F.2d 1069 (Fifth Circuit, 1931)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
31 F.2d 947, 1929 U.S. App. LEXIS 3603, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/strawberry-growers-selling-co-v-american-ry-express-co-ca5-1929.