Straw v. Avvo Inc

• Court: District Court, W.D. Washington
• Decided: March 11, 2020
• Docket: 2:20-cv-00294
• Status: Unknown

Opinion

1 2

3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON 8 AT SEATTLE

9 10 ANDREW U. D. STRAW, CASE NO. C20-0294JLR 11 Plaintiff, ORDER v. 12 AVVO, INC., 13 Defendant. 14

15 Before the court are three motions filed by Plaintiff Andrew U. D. Straw: (1) a 16 motion for United States marshal service of the summons and complaint (Mot. for Serv. 17 (Dkt. # 5)); (2) a motion for PACER and CM/ECF access (Mot. for Access (Dkt. # 6)); 18 and (3) a motion to amend the complaint (Mot. to Am. (Dkt. # 8)). For the reasons set 19 forth below, the court GRANTS Mr. Straw’s motion for service, DENIES Mr. Straw’s 20 motion for PACER and CM/ECF access, and GRANTS Mr. Straw’s motion to amend. 21 The court granted Mr. Straw’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”) in this 22 matter. (See IFP Order (Dkt. # 3).) Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(d) and Federal Rule of 1 Civil Procedure 4(c)(3), upon request, the court must order the United States Marshal or 2 Deputy Marshal to serve the summons and complaint if a plaintiff has been authorized to

3 proceed IFP. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(d); Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(c)(3). Accordingly, the court 4 GRANTS Mr. Straw’s motion for United States marshal service of the summons and 5 complaint. 6 Mr. Straw’s motion for PACER and CM/ECF access requests (1) “unfettered 7 access” to PACER so that Mr. Straw may conduct legal research, and (2) e-filing 8 privileges and user status for the court’s CM/ECF filing system so that Mr. Straw may

9 have “a free copy of every court filing by email.” (See Mot. for Access at 1-2.) Mr. 10 Straw is already registered for electronic filer and electronic service status with the 11 court’s CM/ECF system. (See Not. (Dkt. # 7).) Because he has successfully registered 12 for electronic service, he will receive one “free look” at all documents filed in this case. 13 (See id.) Thus, Mr. Straw’s request for a free copy of every court filing is moot as a

14 result of his successful registration for e-service. Regarding his request for free access to 15 PACER to conduct research, the court concludes that Mr. Straw has not made a showing 16 that his PACER fees should be waived. The expenditure of public funds on behalf of an 17 indigent litigant is proper only when authorized by Congress. See United States v. 18 MacCollom, 426 U.S. 317, 321 (1976). Mr. Straw argues that his IFP status merits free

19 PACER access. However, “[f]ree access to the PACER system is not a listed item under 20 [28 U.S.C.] § 1915.” Meppelink v. Wilmington Sav. Fund Soc’y FSB, No. C19-5655RJB, 21 2019 WL 7290779, at *2 (W.D. Wash. Dec. 30, 2019); see also Katumbusi v. Gary, No. 22 2:14-CV-1534 JAM AC, 2014 WL 5698816, at *4 (E.D. Cal. Oct. 30, 2014) (“[IFP] 1 status alone does not support a request to waive PACER fees.”). Accordingly, the court 2 DENIES Mr. Straw’s motion for PACER and CM/ECF access.

3 Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 15(a)(1) dictates that a party may amend a 4 pleading as a matter of course within 21 days of service. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 15(a)(1). 5 Mr. Straw filed his complaint on February 25, 2020, after he was granted IFP status. (See 6 Compl. (Dkt. # 4).) Mr. Straw filed his motion to amend on February 29, 2020. (See 7 Mot. to Am.) Thus, Mr. Straw is entitled to amend as a matter of course under Rule 15. 8 See Fed. R. Civ. P. 15(a)(1). Accordingly, the court GRANTS Mr. Straw’s motion to

9 amend his complaint. 10 For the foregoing reasons, the court GRANTS Mr. Straw’s motion for service 11 (Dkt. # 5), DENIES Mr. Straw’s motion for PACER and CM/ECF access (Dkt. # 6), and 12 GRANTS Mr. Straw’s motion to amend (Dkt. # 8). The court ORDERS Mr. Straw to file 13 his proposed amended complaint (see Prop. Am. Compl. (Dkt. # 8-2)) on the court’s

14 electronic docket within ten days of the filing date of this order. The court further 15 ORDERS (1) the Clerk to issue the summons and provide copies of the summons and the 16 amended complaint to the United States marshal or deputy marshal within seven days of 17 Mr. Straw’s filing of the amended complaint; and (2) the United States marshal or deputy 18 marshal to serve Defendant Avvo, Inc. with a copy of the summons and amended

19 // 20 // 21 // 22 // 1 complaint within fourteen days of receipt of the summons and amended complaint from 2 the Clerk.

3 Dated this 11th day of March, 2020. 4 A 5 6 JAMES L. ROBART United States District Judge 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18

19 20 21 22