Strauss v. Meyer

22 F. 467, 1884 U.S. App. LEXIS 2558
CourtU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Missouri
DecidedDecember 3, 1884
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 22 F. 467 (Strauss v. Meyer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Missouri primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Strauss v. Meyer, 22 F. 467, 1884 U.S. App. LEXIS 2558 (circtedmo 1884).

Opinion

Treat, J.

The p^rty is not entitled to counsel fees for witnesses called before the master, and I doubt whether he is entitled to fees for witnesses called before the special examiner. Testimony taken before a special examiner is not in the nature of depositions taken at different places where a party may be compelled to go, and I will allow nothing of the kind. I think it is outside of the fee-bill, and outside of the reason of it. The party has to appear and conduct the case before the special examiner who is appointed therefor, and [468]*468.to charge fees for the witnesses called before the special examiner is outside of the rule of taking depositions. If such depositions were taken elsewhere than before the special examiner, then you are entitled to $2.50 for each witness.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

The Mary
233 F. 121 (W.D. Washington, 1916)
Kissinger-Ison Co. v. Bradford Belting Co.
123 F. 91 (Sixth Circuit, 1903)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
22 F. 467, 1884 U.S. App. LEXIS 2558, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/strauss-v-meyer-circtedmo-1884.