Strauss v. Hoadley

48 N.Y.S. 1116

This text of 48 N.Y.S. 1116 (Strauss v. Hoadley) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Strauss v. Hoadley, 48 N.Y.S. 1116 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1897).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

For the reasons assigned

in the opinion in another action, bearing the same title, and decided herewith, the interlocutory judgment should be reversed, and judgment entered sustaining the demurrer, with leave to the plaintiffs to amend upon payment of costs in this court and court below. See 48 N. Y. Supp. 239.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Straus v. Hoadley
23 A.D. 360 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1897)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
48 N.Y.S. 1116, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/strauss-v-hoadley-nyappdiv-1897.