Strauss v. Commercial Center, Inc.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Strauss v. Commercial Center, Inc.

231 So. 2d 529

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided February 10, 1970·No. No. M-84·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This cause having been orally argued before the Court, the briefs and record on appeal having been read and given full consideration, and the appellant having failed to demonstrate reversible error, the final judgment of the lower court appealed from herein is affirmed. See Stephenson v. National Bank of Winter Haven, 92 Fla. 347, 109 So. 424 (1926).

CARROLL, DONALD K., Acting C. J., and WIGGINTON and SPECTOR, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

This cause having been orally argued before the Court, the briefs and record on appeal having been read and given full consideration, and the appellant having failed to demonstrate reversible error, the final judgment of the lower court appealed from herein is affirmed. See Stephenson v. National Bank of Winter Haven, 92 Fla. 347, 109 So. 424 (1926).

CARROLL, DONALD K., Acting C. J., and WIGGINTON and SPECTOR, JJ., concur.

Strauss v. Commercial Center, Inc., 231 So. 2d 529 (Fla. Ct. App. 1970).

Pincite

231 So. 2d 529 (Strauss v. Commercial Center, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related