Strauss v. Brooklyn Heights Railroad

84 N.Y.S. 1147
CourtAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York
DecidedNovember 18, 1903
StatusPublished

This text of 84 N.Y.S. 1147 (Strauss v. Brooklyn Heights Railroad) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Strauss v. Brooklyn Heights Railroad, 84 N.Y.S. 1147 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1903).

Opinion

BISCHOFF, J.

The case was submitted to the trial justice for decision after disagree[1148]*1148xnent of the jury, and his conclusion upon the facts was based necessarily upon his estimate of the relative credibility of the witnesses who testified before him. There is no inherent improbability in the account of the accident as given by the defendant’s witnesses, and the motorman was directly corroborated by a passenger who had a clear view of occurrence. Accepting this evidence, the collision was due mainly to the recklessness of the plaintiff’s servant, and the judgment for the defendant is unassailable. Judgment affirmed, with costs. All concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
84 N.Y.S. 1147, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/strauss-v-brooklyn-heights-railroad-nyappterm-1903.