Strauss Equipment Co. v. Wilson

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Strauss Equipment Co. v. Wilson

157 A. 454, 9 N.J. Misc. 1206, 1931 N.J. Sup. Ct. LEXIS 71

DecidedNovember 23, 1931

StatusPublished

This text of 157 A. 454 (Strauss Equipment Co. v. Wilson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Strauss Equipment Co. v. Wilson, 157 A. 454, 9 N.J. Misc. 1206, 1931 N.J. Sup. Ct. LEXIS 71 (N.J. 1931).

Pincite

Opinion

Pee Ctjeiam.

This is an appeal from a judgment in favor of the plaintiff in the Elizabeth District Court. The trial judge sitting without a jury found that the damages for which the plaintiff' sought recovery were caused by the negligent operation of the-defendant’s car by the defendant’s agent.

The proofs set forth in the settled state of the ease indicate-not only that there was adequate proof to support the findings of negligence but also agency.

The judgment will therefore he affirmed, with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Pee Ctjeiam.

This is an appeal from a judgment in favor of the plaintiff in the Elizabeth District Court. The trial judge sitting without a jury found that the damages for which the plaintiff' sought recovery were caused by the negligent operation of the-defendant’s car by the defendant’s agent.

The proofs set forth in the settled state of the ease indicate-not only that there was adequate proof to support the findings of negligence but also agency.

The judgment will therefore he affirmed, with costs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

157 A. 454, 9 N.J. Misc. 1206, 1931 N.J. Sup. Ct. LEXIS 71, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/strauss-equipment-co-v-wilson-nj-1931.