Strausman v. Herman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Strausman v. Herman

52 A.D.2d 882, 383 N.Y.S.2d 59, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12724

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 10, 1976

StatusPublished

This text of 52 A.D.2d 882 (Strausman v. Herman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Strausman v. Herman, 52 A.D.2d 882, 383 N.Y.S.2d 59, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12724 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1976).

Pincite

Opinion

In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review a determination of the State Rent Administrator, dated July 29, 1975, which computed the rent petitioner could charge a certain tenant upon renewal of that tenant’s lease, the administrator appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, entered January 7, 1976, which, inter alia, annulled the determination. Judgment reversed, on the law, determination confirmed, and petition dismissed on the merits, without costs or disbursements. No findings of fact were presented for review. In light of the affidavit of the Chairman of the Nassau County Rent Guidelines Board, wherein he deposed that the State Rent Administrator’s interpretation of Rent Guideline No. 3 was in accord with the intent of the Nassau County Rent Guidelines Board in issuing the said guideline, the administrator’s determination should not have been annulled. Hopkins, Acting P. J., Martuscello, Latham, Titone and Hawkins, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review a determination of the State Rent Administrator, dated July 29, 1975, which computed the rent petitioner could charge a certain tenant upon renewal of that tenant’s lease, the administrator appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, entered January 7, 1976, which, inter alia, annulled the determination. Judgment reversed, on the law, determination confirmed, and petition dismissed on the merits, without costs or disbursements. No findings of fact were presented for review. In light of the affidavit of the Chairman of the Nassau County Rent Guidelines Board, wherein he deposed that the State Rent Administrator’s interpretation of Rent Guideline No. 3 was in accord with the intent of the Nassau County Rent Guidelines Board in issuing the said guideline, the administrator’s determination should not have been annulled. Hopkins, Acting P. J., Martuscello, Latham, Titone and Hawkins, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

52 A.D.2d 882, 383 N.Y.S.2d 59, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12724, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/strausman-v-herman-nyappdiv-1976.