Strausberg v. Goldbaum

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Strausberg v. Goldbaum

264 A.D. 738, 35 N.Y.S.2d 163, 1942 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4442

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 20, 1942

StatusPublished

This text of 264 A.D. 738 (Strausberg v. Goldbaum) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Strausberg v. Goldbaum, 264 A.D. 738, 35 N.Y.S.2d 163, 1942 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4442 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1942).

Pincite

Opinion

— Action at law. The complaint demands judgment for a sum of money only. Defendant-respondent in his answer pleaded an equitable counterclaim, which he also invoked as a defense. Order dated December 4, 1941, denying motion of plaintiff-appellant for a prior and separate trial of defendant-respondent’s equitable counterclaim, and order dated January 27, 1942, denying a similar motion made by defendant-appellant, affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. No opinion. Lazansky, P. J., Carswell, Johnston, Adel and Taylor, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

— Action at law. The complaint demands judgment for a sum of money only. Defendant-respondent in his answer pleaded an equitable counterclaim, which he also invoked as a defense. Order dated December 4, 1941, denying motion of plaintiff-appellant for a prior and separate trial of defendant-respondent’s equitable counterclaim, and order dated January 27, 1942, denying a similar motion made by defendant-appellant, affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. No opinion. Lazansky, P. J., Carswell, Johnston, Adel and Taylor, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

264 A.D. 738, 35 N.Y.S.2d 163, 1942 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4442, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/strausberg-v-goldbaum-nyappdiv-1942.