Strausbaugh v. Merit Systems Protection Board

Federal Circuit

Strausbaugh v. Merit Systems Protection Board

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

DecidedJune 16, 2010

Docket2010-3104

StatusUnpublished

This text of Strausbaugh v. Merit Systems Protection Board (Strausbaugh v. Merit Systems Protection Board) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Strausbaugh v. Merit Systems Protection Board, (Fed. Cir. 2010).

Pincite

Opinion

NOTE: This order is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals for the FederaI Circuit STEPHEN STRAUSBAUGH, Petitioner, V. MERIT SYSTEMS PROTECTION BOARD, Respondent. 2010-3104 Petition for review of the Merit Systems Protection Board in case nos. AT315H090034-B-1 and AT4324090264-I-2. ON MOTION ORDER Upon consideration of the unopposed motion to reform the ofHcia1 caption to designate the Merit Systems Protection Board as respondent and for an extension of time to file the respondent’s informal brief, IT ls ORDERED THAT:

STRAUSBAUGH V. MSPB 2 (1) The motions are granted The revised official caption is reflected ab0ve. (2) The Board’s informal brief is due within 21 days of the date of filing of this order. FOR THE COURT 1 6 fs/ Jan Horba1}§ Date J an Horbaly C1erk cc: Stephen Strausbaugh, Esq. C0urtney S. McNamara, Esq. §§ Michael Carney, Esq. u _EA mn 320 aaa rata JUN 1 5 2019 .lAN HORBALY CLEBK

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

NOTE: This order is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals for the FederaI Circuit STEPHEN STRAUSBAUGH, Petitioner, V. MERIT SYSTEMS PROTECTION BOARD, Respondent. 2010-3104 Petition for review of the Merit Systems Protection Board in case nos. AT315H090034-B-1 and AT4324090264-I-2. ON MOTION ORDER Upon consideration of the unopposed motion to reform the ofHcia1 caption to designate the Merit Systems Protection Board as respondent and for an extension of time to file the respondent’s informal brief, IT ls ORDERED THAT:

STRAUSBAUGH V. MSPB 2 (1) The motions are granted The revised official caption is reflected ab0ve. (2) The Board’s informal brief is due within 21 days of the date of filing of this order. FOR THE COURT 1 6 fs/ Jan Horba1}§ Date J an Horbaly C1erk cc: Stephen Strausbaugh, Esq. C0urtney S. McNamara, Esq. §§ Michael Carney, Esq. u _EA mn 320 aaa rata JUN 1 5 2019 .lAN HORBALY CLEBK

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

Strausbaugh v. Merit Systems Protection Board, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/strausbaugh-v-merit-systems-protection-board-cafc-2010.