Straus v. The Burgundia
This text of 29 F. 607 (Straus v. The Burgundia) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
I concur in the conclusion of the district judge that there must he a decree for the libelants.1 The case is substantially like that of The Surrey,2 in this court. The six drums came in .good order, whatever perils of the sea there were, if the two drums which were broken had been stowed properly, they would not have heen injured. If all eight were stowed in an equally proper place, then the stowage of the two could not, in detail and arrangement, have been proper or sufficient. If the two were stowed in a less safe place than the six, considering the peculiar character of the drums, that was improper stowage. On the whole evidence, including the ■new testimony taken in this court, the carrier has not relieved itself from its liability, or successfully rebutted the presumption of negligent stowage as the cause of .the damage.
There must be a decree for the libelants for $649, with interest from March 1, 1884, aud their costs in the district court, taxed at .$129.86, and their costs in this court, to be taxed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
29 F. 607, 1886 U.S. App. LEXIS 2502, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/straus-v-the-burgundia-circtedny-1886.