Straus v. Morton F. Plant Hospital Foundation, Inc.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Straus v. Morton F. Plant Hospital Foundation, Inc.

478 So. 2d 472, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 2564, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 16731

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedNovember 13, 1985

DocketNos. 84-2516, 84-2517

StatusPublished

Cited by4 cases

This text of 478 So. 2d 472 (Straus v. Morton F. Plant Hospital Foundation, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Straus v. Morton F. Plant Hospital Foundation, Inc., 478 So. 2d 472, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 2564, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 16731 (Fla. Ct. App. 1985).

Pincite

Opinion

CAMPBELL, Judge.

This is an appeal from the trial court’s refusal to tax, as costs, fees for attorneys who testified as experts in the proceedings [473]*473below. Those proceedings were for the purpose of determining compensation for the personal representative and his attorneys. The trial court relied on this court’s decision in B & L Motors, Inc. v. Bignotti, 427 So.2d 1070 (Fla. 2d DCA 1983), in denying the assessment of the expert attorney’s fees as costs. The supreme court has subsequently decided Travieso v. Travieso, 474 So.2d 1184 (Fla.1985), in which it disapproved Bignotti.

We therefore reverse and remand this cause to the trial court for reconsideration in light of Travieso. In doing so, we consider it only fair that we inform the trial judge that we construe the Travieso holding ¹ to make the award of such expert fees discretionary only where the testifying attorney expert does not expect to be compensated for that testimony.

GRIMES, A.C.J., and FRANK, J., concur.

¹

. "We hold that pursuant to section 92.231, expert witness fees, at the discretion of the trial court, may be taxed as costs for a lawyer who testifies as an expert as to reasonable attorney’s fees. We do not hold that such expert witness fees must be awarded in all cases. Generally, lawyers are willing to testify gratuitously for other lawyers on the issue of reasonable attorney’s fees. This traditionally has been a matter of professional courtesy. An attorney is an officer of the court and should be willing to give the expert testimony necessary to ensure that the trial court has the requisite competent evidence to determine reasonable fees. Only in the exceptional case where the time required for preparation and testifying is burdensome, should the attorney expect compensation.” Tra-vieso, 474 So.2d at 1186.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

CAMPBELL, Judge.

This is an appeal from the trial court’s refusal to tax, as costs, fees for attorneys who testified as experts in the proceedings [473]*473below. Those proceedings were for the purpose of determining compensation for the personal representative and his attorneys. The trial court relied on this court’s decision in B & L Motors, Inc. v. Bignotti, 427 So.2d 1070 (Fla. 2d DCA 1983), in denying the assessment of the expert attorney’s fees as costs. The supreme court has subsequently decided Travieso v. Travieso, 474 So.2d 1184 (Fla.1985), in which it disapproved Bignotti.

We therefore reverse and remand this cause to the trial court for reconsideration in light of Travieso. In doing so, we consider it only fair that we inform the trial judge that we construe the Travieso holding ¹ to make the award of such expert fees discretionary only where the testifying attorney expert does not expect to be compensated for that testimony.

GRIMES, A.C.J., and FRANK, J., concur.

¹

. "We hold that pursuant to section 92.231, expert witness fees, at the discretion of the trial court, may be taxed as costs for a lawyer who testifies as an expert as to reasonable attorney’s fees. We do not hold that such expert witness fees must be awarded in all cases. Generally, lawyers are willing to testify gratuitously for other lawyers on the issue of reasonable attorney’s fees. This traditionally has been a matter of professional courtesy. An attorney is an officer of the court and should be willing to give the expert testimony necessary to ensure that the trial court has the requisite competent evidence to determine reasonable fees. Only in the exceptional case where the time required for preparation and testifying is burdensome, should the attorney expect compensation.” Tra-vieso, 474 So.2d at 1186.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

478 So. 2d 472, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 2564, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 16731, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/straus-v-morton-f-plant-hospital-foundation-inc-fladistctapp-1985.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack