Home/Supreme Court of North Carolina/Straughn v. Capital, Coca-Cola Co.

Straughn v. Capital, Coca-Cola Co.

205 N.C. 836
CourtSupreme Court of North Carolina
DecidedNovember 22, 1933
StatusPublished

This text of 205 N.C. 836 (Straughn v. Capital, Coca-Cola Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Straughn v. Capital, Coca-Cola Co., 205 N.C. 836 (N.C. 1933).

Opinion

Pek Oubiam.

Tbe case seems to' bave been tried in substantial conformity to tbe decisions on tbe subject. Corum v. Tobacco Co., ante, 213; Broadway v. Grimes, 204 N. C., 623, 169 S. E., 194; Perry v. Bottling Co., 196 N. C., 175, 145 S. E., 14. Tbe appeal presents no new question of law or one not heretofore settled by a number of decisions. Tbe verdict and judgment will be upheld.

No error.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Perry v. Kelford Coca-Cola Bottling Co.
145 S.E. 14 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1928)
Broadway v. . Grimes
169 S.E. 194 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1933)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
205 N.C. 836, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/straughn-v-capital-coca-cola-co-nc-1933.