Straughan v. Flood Co.

Ohio Supreme Court

Straughan v. Flood Co.

789 N.E.2d 629, 99 Ohio St. 3d 1429

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedJune 6, 2003

Docket2003-0429

StatusPublished

This text of 789 N.E.2d 629 (Straughan v. Flood Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Straughan v. Flood Co., 789 N.E.2d 629, 99 Ohio St. 3d 1429 (Ohio 2003).

Pincite

Opinion

Cuyahoga App. No. 81086, 2003-0hio-290. On June 2, 2003, appellees filed a memorandum opposing motion for reconsideration which was due May 30, 2003. Rule XIV, Section 1(C) of the Rules of Practice of the Supreme Court prohibits the filing of a memorandum that is not timely. Accordingly,

IT IS ORDERED by the court, sua sponte, that the memorandum opposing motion for reconsideration be, and hereby is, stricken.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cuyahoga App. No. 81086, 2003-0hio-290. On June 2, 2003, appellees filed a memorandum opposing motion for reconsideration which was due May 30, 2003. Rule XIV, Section 1(C) of the Rules of Practice of the Supreme Court prohibits the filing of a memorandum that is not timely. Accordingly,

IT IS ORDERED by the court, sua sponte, that the memorandum opposing motion for reconsideration be, and hereby is, stricken.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

789 N.E.2d 629, 99 Ohio St. 3d 1429, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/straughan-v-flood-co-ohio-2003.