Stratton v. Tidewater Auchter Co.

Supreme Court of Florida

Stratton v. Tidewater Auchter Co.

167 So. 2d 311

CourtSupreme Court of Florida

DecidedSeptember 9, 1964

DocketNo. 33367

StatusPublished

This text of 167 So. 2d 311 (Stratton v. Tidewater Auchter Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Stratton v. Tidewater Auchter Co., 167 So. 2d 311 (Fla. 1964).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

By petition for a writ of certiorari we have for review an order of the Florida Industrial Commission bearing date February 4, 1964.

We find that oral argument would serve no useful purpose and it is therefore dispensed with pursuant to Florida Appellate Rule 3.10, subd. e, 31 F.S.A.

Our consideration of the petition, the record and briefs leads us to conclude that there has been no deviation from the essential requirements of law.

The petition is therefore denied.

DREW, C. J., and THORNAL, O’CONNELL, CALDWELL and ERVIN, JJ., concur. '

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI