Stratton v. Taylor

32 Miss. 201
CourtMississippi Supreme Court
DecidedOctober 15, 1856
StatusPublished

This text of 32 Miss. 201 (Stratton v. Taylor) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Mississippi Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Stratton v. Taylor, 32 Miss. 201 (Mich. 1856).

Opinion

Fisher, J.,

delivered tbe opinion of tbe court.

This action was commenced by Wright, Davenport & Co., as indorsees of a promissory note, made by Stratton, payable to Taylor & Richardson. Finding that they were mistaken as to tbe indorsement of the note, an amended complaint was filed, making Taylor & Richardson, tbe nominal plaintiffs, and Wrigbt, Davenport & Co., tbe usees. It is insisted that this amendment could not be made under tbe Pleading Act of 1850.

Tbe 13th section of that act gives tbe court full power to make amendments, either by adding or striking out tbe name of any party to a pleading. Tbe amendment in this instance was fully authorized by this section.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
32 Miss. 201, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stratton-v-taylor-miss-1856.