Stratton v. Social Security Administration, Commissioner of

D. Kansas

Stratton v. Social Security Administration, Commissioner of

DecidedApril 1, 2020

Docket6:20-cv-01081

StatusUnknown

This text of Stratton v. Social Security Administration, Commissioner of (Stratton v. Social Security Administration, Commissioner of) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, D. Kansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Stratton v. Social Security Administration, Commissioner of, (D. Kan. 2020).

Pincite

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS HEATHER STRATTON, Plaintiff, vs. Case No. 20-1081-DDC ANDREW M. SAUL, Acting Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant. ___________________________________ MEMORANDUM AND ORDER On March 25, 2020, plaintiff filed a Complaint against the Commissioner of the Social Security Administration. Doc. 1. Her Complaint seeks judicial review under 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) of a decision of the Commissioner of the Social Security Administration denying benefits. Id. at 1–2. Plaintiff also has moved for leave to file this action in forma pauperis. Doc. 4. She has submitted an affidavit of financial status supporting her request. Id. at 2–7. Under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(1), the court may authorize a person to commence an action without prepayment of fees after the submission of an affidavit demonstrating an inability to pay. The court has broad discretion to grant or deny permission to proceed in forma pauperis. United States v. Garcia, 164 F. App’x 785, 786 n.1 (10th Cir. 2006). But the court cannot act arbitrarily or deny an application on erroneous grounds. Id. “‘[T]o succeed on a motion to proceed [in forma pauperis], the movant must show a financial inability to pay the required filing fees . . . .’” Id. (quotingLister v. Dep’t of the Treasury, 408 F.3d 1309, 1312 (10th Cir. 2005)). After reviewing plaintiff’s financial affidavit, the court finds that plaintiff has made a sufficient showing that she is unable to pay the required filing fees. The court thus grants plaintiff’ s request for leave to file this action without payment of fees, costs, or security under 28 USS.C. § 1915(a)(1). IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED BY THE COURT THAT plaintiff’s Application for Leave to File Action Without Payment of Fees, Costs, or Security (Doc. 4) is granted. The Clerk shall prepare a summons under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4 on plaintiffs behalf. The Clerk shall issue the summons to the United States Marshal or Deputy Marshal, who the court appoints under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(c)(3), to effect service. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated this Ist day of April, 2020, at Kansas City, Kansas. s/ Daniel D. Crabtree Daniel D. Crabtree United States District Judge

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS HEATHER STRATTON, Plaintiff, vs. Case No. 20-1081-DDC ANDREW M. SAUL, Acting Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant. ___________________________________ MEMORANDUM AND ORDER On March 25, 2020, plaintiff filed a Complaint against the Commissioner of the Social Security Administration. Doc. 1. Her Complaint seeks judicial review under 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) of a decision of the Commissioner of the Social Security Administration denying benefits. Id. at 1–2. Plaintiff also has moved for leave to file this action in forma pauperis. Doc. 4. She has submitted an affidavit of financial status supporting her request. Id. at 2–7. Under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(1), the court may authorize a person to commence an action without prepayment of fees after the submission of an affidavit demonstrating an inability to pay. The court has broad discretion to grant or deny permission to proceed in forma pauperis. United States v. Garcia, 164 F. App’x 785, 786 n.1 (10th Cir. 2006). But the court cannot act arbitrarily or deny an application on erroneous grounds. Id. “‘[T]o succeed on a motion to proceed [in forma pauperis], the movant must show a financial inability to pay the required filing fees . . . .’” Id. (quotingLister v. Dep’t of the Treasury, 408 F.3d 1309, 1312 (10th Cir. 2005)). After reviewing plaintiff’s financial affidavit, the court finds that plaintiff has made a sufficient showing that she is unable to pay the required filing fees. The court thus grants plaintiff’ s request for leave to file this action without payment of fees, costs, or security under 28 USS.C. § 1915(a)(1). IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED BY THE COURT THAT plaintiff’s Application for Leave to File Action Without Payment of Fees, Costs, or Security (Doc. 4) is granted. The Clerk shall prepare a summons under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4 on plaintiffs behalf. The Clerk shall issue the summons to the United States Marshal or Deputy Marshal, who the court appoints under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(c)(3), to effect service. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated this Ist day of April, 2020, at Kansas City, Kansas. s/ Daniel D. Crabtree Daniel D. Crabtree United States District Judge

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

Stratton v. Social Security Administration, Commissioner of, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stratton-v-social-security-administration-commissioner-of-ksd-2020.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack