Stratford v. Chrysler Financial Co.
This text of 27 A.D.3d 452 (Stratford v. Chrysler Financial Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendants Edward Avin and Rosalie Avin appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Richmond County (Giacobbe, J.), entered August 18, 2005, which denied their motion for leave to serve a third-party complaint against their insurance company.
Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law, without costs or disbursements, and the motion is granted.
Under the circumstances, the Supreme Court should have granted the appellants’ motion for leave to serve a third-party complaint against their insurance company (see CPLR 1007; cf. Lucci v Lucci, 150 AD2d 649, 650 [1989]). Schmidt, J.P., Crane, Krausman, Skelos and Lunn, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
27 A.D.3d 452, 809 N.Y.S.2d 919, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stratford-v-chrysler-financial-co-nyappdiv-2006.