Strategic Technology Institute, Inc.
Opinion
ARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACT APPEALS
Appeal of - ) ) Strategic Technology Institute, Inc. ) ASBCA No. 62427 ) Under Contract No. FA8108-17-F-0050 )
APPEARANCES FOR THE APPELLANT: James Y. Boland, Esq. Venable LLP Washington, DC
Christopher G. Griesedieck, Esq. Venable LLP Tysons Corner, VA
APPEARANCES FOR THE GOVERNMENT: Caryl A. Potter, III, Esq. Air Force Deputy Chief Trial Attorney Siobhan Donahue, Esq. Isabelle P. Cutting, Esq. Trial Attorneys
OPINION BY ADMINISTRATIVE JUDGE PROUTY
The parties have resolved their dispute and request that the Board enter judgment in favor of appellant.
It is the Board’s decision, pursuant to 41 U.S.C. §§ 7105(e), 7108(b), and the parties’ stipulation and agreement, that the appeal is sustained. In the nature of a consent judgment, the Board makes a monetary award to appellant in the amount of $500,000. This amount is inclusive of Contract Disputes Act interest. No further interest shall be paid
Dated: May 1, 2025
J. REID PROUTY Administrative Judge Vice Chairman Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals (Signatures continued) I concur I concur
MICHAEL N. O’CONNELL LAURA EYESTER Administrative Judge Administrative Judge Acting Chairman Armed Services Board Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals of Contract Appeals
I certify that the foregoing is a true copy of the Opinion and Decision of the Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals in ASBCA No. 62427, Appeal of Strategic Technology Institute, Inc., rendered in conformance with the Board’s Charter.
Dated: May 2, 2025
PAULLA K. GATES-LEWIS Recorder, Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Strategic Technology Institute, Inc. (Strategic Technology Institute, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.