Strasser v. Silverman
This text of 231 A.D. 872 (Strasser v. Silverman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order in so far as it grants plaintiff leave to amend his complaint upon condition and in so far as it denies motion of defendant Edith Silverman for judgment on her counterclaim against the defendant insurance company affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements; the amended complaint to be served within ten days from the entry of the order herein. In our opinion, the former designees under the policy of Amelia and David R. Cohen should be made parties to the action and their claim to the fund, if any, litigated. Lazansky, P. J., Young, Kapper, Hagarty and Tompkins, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
231 A.D. 872, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/strasser-v-silverman-nyappdiv-1930.