Strasnick v. American Wood Products Corp.

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Strasnick v. American Wood Products Corp.

65 N.E.2d 310, 319 Mass. 723, 1946 Mass. LEXIS 574

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court·Decided January 2, 1946·Published

Opinion

Decree affirmed with costs. The bill alleges wrongs to a corporation in which the plaintiff is a minority stockholder, done by one Berns who owns or controls a majority of the stock. It alleges also wrongs done by the same Berns to the plaintiff individually with respect to a note owed by the plaintiff to another corporation controlled by Berns, to secure which the plaintiff pledged his minority stock in the first named corporation. The demurrer was properly sustained on the ground of multifariousness, if on no other ground. The case is governed by Whitney v. Whitney, 296 Mass. 13. Following the sustaining of the demurrer, the bill was properly dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Decree affirmed with costs. The bill alleges wrongs to a corporation in which the plaintiff is a minority stockholder, done by one Berns who owns or controls a majority of the stock. It alleges also wrongs done by the same Berns to the plaintiff individually with respect to a note owed by the plaintiff to another corporation controlled by Berns, to secure which the plaintiff pledged his minority stock in the first named corporation. The demurrer was properly sustained on the ground of multifariousness, if on no other ground. The case is governed by Whitney v. Whitney, 296 Mass. 13. Following the sustaining of the demurrer, the bill was properly dismissed.

Strasnick v. American Wood Products Corp., 65 N.E.2d 310, 319 Mass. 723, 1946 Mass. LEXIS 574 (Mass. 1946).

Pincite

65 N.E.2d 310 (Strasnick v. American Wood Products Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related