Strange v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Strange v. State

70 S.E. 968, 9 Ga. App. 204, 1911 Ga. App. LEXIS 472

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedApril 11, 1911

Docket3180

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 70 S.E. 968 (Strange v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Strange v. State, 70 S.E. 968, 9 Ga. App. 204, 1911 Ga. App. LEXIS 472 (Ga. Ct. App. 1911).

Pincite

Opinion

Hied, O'. J.

1. The evidence is in direct conflict as to whether the crime was commited in Hart county or in Franklin county. The jury settled the conflict by finding that it was committed in Hart county.

2. The trial judge did not abuse his discretion in refusing to grant another trial because of alleged newly discovered evidence, since a lack of diligence in procuring the evidence on the first trial was manifest.

3. No error appears, and the verdict is amply supported'.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hied, O'. J.

1. The evidence is in direct conflict as to whether the crime was commited in Hart county or in Franklin county. The jury settled the conflict by finding that it was committed in Hart county.

2. The trial judge did not abuse his discretion in refusing to grant another trial because of alleged newly discovered evidence, since a lack of diligence in procuring the evidence on the first trial was manifest.

3. No error appears, and the verdict is amply supported'.

Judgment affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

70 S.E. 968, 9 Ga. App. 204, 1911 Ga. App. LEXIS 472, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/strange-v-state-gactapp-1911.

Opinion

3. No error appears, and the verdict is amply supported'.

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack