Strange v. State
70 S.E. 968, 9 Ga. App. 204, 1911 Ga. App. LEXIS 472
Opinion
1. The evidence is in direct conflict as to whether the crime was commited in Hart county or in Franklin county. The jury settled the conflict by finding that it was committed in Hart county.
2. The trial judge did not abuse his discretion in refusing to grant another trial because of alleged newly discovered evidence, since a lack of diligence in procuring the evidence on the first trial was manifest.
3. No error appears, and the verdict is amply supported'.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Strange v. State, 70 S.E. 968, 9 Ga. App. 204, 1911 Ga. App. LEXIS 472 (Ga. Ct. App. 1911).
70 S.E. 968 (Strange v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Ware v. State
89 S.E. 155 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1916)