Strange v. State

Alabama Court of Appeals

Strange v. State

129 So. 926, 24 Ala. App. 688

CourtAlabama Court of Appeals

DecidedJune 30, 1930

Docket7 Div. 666.

StatusPublished

This text of 129 So. 926 (Strange v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Alabama Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Strange v. State, 129 So. 926, 24 Ala. App. 688 (Ala. Ct. App. 1930).

Pincite

Opinion

BRIOKEN, P. J.

There was no evidence to sustain the charge contained in the indictment upon which this appellant ivas tried and convicted, and at the close of the state’s case the trial court should have granted the motion of defendant to exclude the evidence and discharge the defendant, and the exception reserved to the ruling of the court in this connection is sustained. The judgment of conviction from which this appeal was taken is reversed, and one here rendered discharging this appellant from further custody in this proceeding.

Reversed and rendered;

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

BRIOKEN, P. J.

There was no evidence to sustain the charge contained in the indictment upon which this appellant ivas tried and convicted, and at the close of the state’s case the trial court should have granted the motion of defendant to exclude the evidence and discharge the defendant, and the exception reserved to the ruling of the court in this connection is sustained. The judgment of conviction from which this appeal was taken is reversed, and one here rendered discharging this appellant from further custody in this proceeding.

Reversed and rendered;

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

129 So. 926, 24 Ala. App. 688, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/strange-v-state-alactapp-1930.