Strang v. Prudential Insurance of America

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Strang v. Prudential Insurance of America

239 A.D. 798

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 15, 1933

StatusPublished

This text of 239 A.D. 798 (Strang v. Prudential Insurance of America) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Strang v. Prudential Insurance of America, 239 A.D. 798 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1933).

Pincite

Opinion

Judgment and order of the City Court of Yonkers affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Young, Tompkins and Davis, JJ., concur; Lazansky, P. J., with whom Hagarty, J., concurs, dissents upon the following grounds: (1) There was no proof that plaintiff filed proofs of death. (2) Exhibits E and F for identification should have been admitted at the instance of defendant. Admissions in these papers, made by plaintiff as an individual, are binding on him as administrator.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment and order of the City Court of Yonkers affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Young, Tompkins and Davis, JJ., concur; Lazansky, P. J., with whom Hagarty, J., concurs, dissents upon the following grounds: (1) There was no proof that plaintiff filed proofs of death. (2) Exhibits E and F for identification should have been admitted at the instance of defendant. Admissions in these papers, made by plaintiff as an individual, are binding on him as administrator.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

239 A.D. 798, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/strang-v-prudential-insurance-of-america-nyappdiv-1933.