Strang v. Braddock Borough

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Strang v. Braddock Borough

33 A. 760, 172 Pa. 601, 1896 Pa. LEXIS 818

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided January 6, 1896·No. Appeal, No. 65·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Green,

The judgment in this case is affirmed for the reasons stated in the opinion just filed in the case of William Bowers v. The Borough of Braddock, No. 64, Oct. T., 1895. The motion to quash is refused as there is no inconsistency in filing exceptions to the report of the viewers and at the same time entering an appeal to the common pleas under the act of 13th June, 1874, P. L. 283.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Green,

The judgment in this case is affirmed for the reasons stated in the opinion just filed in the case of William Bowers v. The Borough of Braddock, No. 64, Oct. T., 1895. The motion to quash is refused as there is no inconsistency in filing exceptions to the report of the viewers and at the same time entering an appeal to the common pleas under the act of 13th June, 1874, P. L. 283.

Judgment affirmed.

Strang v. Braddock Borough, 33 A. 760, 172 Pa. 601, 1896 Pa. LEXIS 818 (Pa. 1896).

Pincite

33 A. 760 (Strang v. Braddock Borough) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related