Strang v. Braddock Borough

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Strang v. Braddock Borough

33 A. 760, 172 Pa. 601, 1896 Pa. LEXIS 818

CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania

DecidedJanuary 6, 1896

DocketAppeal, No. 65

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 33 A. 760 (Strang v. Braddock Borough) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Strang v. Braddock Borough, 33 A. 760, 172 Pa. 601, 1896 Pa. LEXIS 818 (Pa. 1896).

Pincite

Opinion

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Green,

The judgment in this case is affirmed for the reasons stated in the opinion just filed in the case of William Bowers v. The Borough of Braddock, No. 64, Oct. T., 1895. The motion to quash is refused as there is no inconsistency in filing exceptions to the report of the viewers and at the same time entering an appeal to the common pleas under the act of 13th June, 1874, P. L. 283.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Green,

The judgment in this case is affirmed for the reasons stated in the opinion just filed in the case of William Bowers v. The Borough of Braddock, No. 64, Oct. T., 1895. The motion to quash is refused as there is no inconsistency in filing exceptions to the report of the viewers and at the same time entering an appeal to the common pleas under the act of 13th June, 1874, P. L. 283.

Judgment affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

33 A. 760, 172 Pa. 601, 1896 Pa. LEXIS 818, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/strang-v-braddock-borough-pa-1896.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack