Strand v. Travelers Insurance Company

219 N.W.2d 622, 300 Minn. 311, 1974 Minn. LEXIS 1339
Supreme Court of Minnesota·Decided June 28, 1974·No. 43993·Published·Cited by 6 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

A jury found that defendant insurance company acted in bad faith in refusing to settle a personal injury claim against its insured, plaintiff’s assignor, within the limits of the automobile insurance policy. The court denied defendant’s blended post-trial motion for judgment n. o. v. or a new trial, concluding that the jury’s verdict was fully sustained by the evidence. The court further concluded the action had been commenced within the time limitations of Minn. St. 541.05(1), the applicable statute, and that the proper measure of damages was the full amount of *312 the difference between the policy limit and the verdict in the initial action, undiminished by the discharge in bankruptcy of plaintiff’s assignor. We hold that the trial court rulings on matters of law were correct and that the jury’s verdict has sufficient evidentiary support.

Affirmed.

Mr. Chief Justice Sheran, not having been a member of this court at the time of the argument and submission, took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Strand v. Travelers Insurance Company, 219 N.W.2d 622, 300 Minn. 311, 1974 Minn. LEXIS 1339 (Mich. 1974).

219 N.W.2d 622 (Strand v. Travelers Insurance Company) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Boyle v. Zurich American Insurance
31 Mass. L. Rptr. 396 (Massachusetts Superior Court, 2013)
Jerry Mathison Construction, Inc. v. Binsfield
615 N.W.2d 378 (Court of Appeals of Minnesota, 2000)
Helmbolt v. LeMars Mutual Insurance Co.
404 N.W.2d 55 (South Dakota Supreme Court, 1987)
Morris v. American Family Mutual Insurance Co.
386 N.W.2d 233 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1986)
Short v. Dairyland Insurance Co.
334 N.W.2d 384 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1983)