Home/Supreme Court/Strand v. Michigan Bell Telephone

Strand v. Michigan Bell Telephone

531 U.S. 816, 121 S. Ct. 54
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedOctober 2, 2000
DocketNo. 99-1878
StatusPublished
Cited by6 cases

This text of 531 U.S. 816 (Strand v. Michigan Bell Telephone) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Strand v. Michigan Bell Telephone, 531 U.S. 816, 121 S. Ct. 54 (2000).

Opinion

C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

BellSouth v. NC Utilities
Fourth Circuit, 2002
Bell Atlantic v. MCI
Fourth Circuit, 2002
Bellsouth Telecommunications, Incorporated, United States of America Federal Communications Commission, Intervenors v. North Carolina Utilities Commission, and Us Lecof North Carolina, Llc, Bellsouth Telecommunications, Incorporated, United States of America Federal Communications Commission, Intervenors v. North Carolina Utilities Commission, and Intermedia Communications, Bellsouth Telecommunications, Incorporated v. North Carolina Utilities Commission, McImetro Access Transmission Services, Incorporated, United States of America Federal Communications Commission, Intervenors. Bellsouth Telecommunications, Incorporated, United States of America Federal Communications Commission, Intervenors v. Us Lecof North Carolina, Llc, and North Carolina Utilities Commission
240 F.3d 270 (Fourth Circuit, 2001)
Bell Atlantic Maryland, Incorporated v. MCI Worldcom, Incorporated American Communications Services of Maryland, Incorporated Rcn Telecom Services of Maryland, Incorporated Starpower Communications, LLC Tcg Maryland McImetro Access Transmission Services, Incorporated the Public Service Commission of Maryland Glenn F. Ivey, in His Official Capacity as Chairman of the Public Service Commission of Maryland Claude M. Ligon, in His Official Capacity as Commissioner of the Public Service Commission of Maryland E. Mason Hendrickson, in His Official Capacity as Commissioner of the Public Service Commission of Maryland Susan Brogan, in Her Official Capacity as Commissioner of the Public Service Commission of Maryland Catherine I. Riley, in Her Official Capacity as Commissioner of the Public Service Commission of Maryland, United States of America, Intervenor/defendant-Appellee, Maryland Office of People's Counsel, Bell Atlantic Maryland, Incorporated, and United States of America, Intervenor v. The Public Service Commission of Maryland Glenn F. Ivey, in His Official Capacity as Chairman of the Public Service Commission of Maryland Claude M. Ligon, in His Official Capacity as Commissioner of the Public Service Commission of Maryland E. Mason Hendrickson, in His Official Capacity as Commissioner of the Public Service Commission of Maryland Susan Brogan, in Her Official Capacity as Commissioner of the Public Service Commission of Maryland Catherine I. Riley, in Her Official Capacity as Commissioner of the Public Service Commission of Maryland, and American Communications Services of Maryland, Incorporated Rcn Telecom Services of Maryland, Incorporated Starpower Communications, LLC Tcgmaryland McImetro Access Transmission Services, Incorporated Maryland Office of People's Counsel MCI Worldcom, Incorporated
240 F.3d 279 (Fourth Circuit, 2001)
BellSouth Telecommunications, Inc. v. North Carolina Utilities Commission
240 F.3d 270 (Fourth Circuit, 2001)
Bell Atlantic Maryland, Inc. v. MCI Worldcom, Inc.
240 F.3d 279 (Fourth Circuit, 2001)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
531 U.S. 816, 121 S. Ct. 54, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/strand-v-michigan-bell-telephone-scotus-2000.