Strand v. . Blunden
1 N.C. 784
Opinion
In case. The judgment was ideo consideratum est quod quaerensrecuperaret; and reversed; it ought to have been quod recuperet. H. 2 Car.rot., 121, vel 122; Bendl., 193.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Strand v. . Blunden, 1 N.C. 784 (kingsbench 1793).
1 N.C. 784 (Strand v. . Blunden) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.