Strand Classics v. Emiliano

Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Strand Classics v. Emiliano

DecidedMay 2, 2018

Docket2018-UP-171

StatusUnpublished

This text of Strand Classics v. Emiliano (Strand Classics v. Emiliano) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Strand Classics v. Emiliano, (S.C. Ct. App. 2018).

Pincite

Opinion

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Court of Appeals

Strand Classics Restorations, Appellant,

v.

Frank Emiliano, Respondent.

Appellate Case No. 2016-001409

Appeal From Georgetown County Kristi Lea Harrington, Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2018-UP-171 Submitted March 1, 2018 – Filed May 2, 2018

AFFIRMED

Raymond Carl Fischer and William Stuart Duncan, of Georgetown, for Appellant.

Frank Emiliano, of Coral Springs, Florida, pro se.

PER CURIAM: Affirmed pursuant to Rule 220(b), SCACR, and the following authority: Indigo Assocs. v. Ryan Inv. Co., 314 S.C. 519, 523, 431 S.E.2d 271, 273 (Ct. App. 1993) ("The circuit court, acting as an appellate court in a case heard by the magistrate, cannot consider questions that have not been presented to the magistrate."). AFFIRMED.1

SHORT, THOMAS, and HILL, JJ., concur.

1 We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI