Stramel v. Stramel

Missouri Court of Appeals

Stramel v. Stramel

458 S.W.3d 855, 2015 Mo. App. LEXIS 433, 2015 WL 1813027

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided April 21, 2015·No. WD 77561·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Stanley J. Stramel (“Husband”) appeals from a judgment dissolving his marriage to Linda S. Stramel (“Wife”). Husband argues that the property division contained in the judgment failed to address a marital debt; that the judgment erroneously ordered a cash equalization payment as part of the property division; and that the judgment failed to comply with the provisions of § 452.335, RSMo when ordering Husband to pay maintenance to Wife. We affirm. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, an unpublished memorandum setting forth the reasons for this order has been provided to the parties. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Stanley J. Stramel (“Husband”) appeals from a judgment dissolving his marriage to Linda S. Stramel (“Wife”). Husband argues that the property division contained in the judgment failed to address a marital debt; that the judgment erroneously ordered a cash equalization payment as part of the property division; and that the judgment failed to comply with the provisions of § 452.335, RSMo when ordering Husband to pay maintenance to Wife. We affirm. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, an unpublished memorandum setting forth the reasons for this order has been provided to the parties. Rule 84.16(b).

Stramel v. Stramel, 458 S.W.3d 855, 2015 Mo. App. LEXIS 433, 2015 WL 1813027 (Mo. Ct. App. 2015).

Pincite

458 S.W.3d 855 (Stramel v. Stramel) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.