Strahley v. Pruitt Corp.

512 S.E.2d 710, 236 Ga. App. 588, 99 Fulton County D. Rep. 1085, 1999 Ga. App. LEXIS 272
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Strahley v. Pruitt Corp.. Read the opinion of the Court — 231 Ga. App. 502
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided February 22, 1999·No. A97A2367·Published

Opinion

Ruffin, Judge.

In Strahley v. Pruitt Corp., 231 Ga. App. 502 (498 SE2d 78) (1998), we reversed the grant of summary judgment to Pruitt Corporation (Pruitt) on Strahley’s interference with a contract claim and affirmed the grant of summary judgment to Pruitt on Strahley’s claim of interference with business relations. In Pruitt Corp. v. Strahley, 270 Ga. 430 (510 SE2d 821) (1999), the Supreme Court reversed our decision as to Strahley’s tortious interference with the contract claim. Accordingly, Division 1 of our prior opinion, dealing with the claim of tortious interference with a contract, is vacated and the judgment of the Supreme Court is made the judgment of this Court. Division 2 of our prior opinion, which affirmed the grant of summary judgment to Pruitt on Strahley’s claim of interference with business relations, was not affected by the Supreme Court’s decision and, therefore, stands.

Judgment affirmed.

Eldridge and Barnes, JJ, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Strahley v. Pruitt Corp., 512 S.E.2d 710, 236 Ga. App. 588, 99 Fulton County D. Rep. 1085, 1999 Ga. App. LEXIS 272 (Ga. Ct. App. 1999).

512 S.E.2d 710 (Strahley v. Pruitt Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Strahley v. Pruitt Corp.
498 S.E.2d 78 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1998)
Pruitt Corp. v. Strahley
510 S.E.2d 821 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1999)