Strahlendorff v. Board of Education

New Jersey Department of Labor Workmen's Compensation Bureau

Strahlendorff v. Board of Education

4 A.2d 848, 17 N.J. Misc. 51, 1939 N.J. Misc. LEXIS 6

CourtNew Jersey Department of Labor Workmen's Compensation Bureau

DecidedFebruary 28, 1939

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 4 A.2d 848 (Strahlendorff v. Board of Education) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New Jersey Department of Labor Workmen's Compensation Bureau primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Strahlendorff v. Board of Education, 4 A.2d 848, 17 N.J. Misc. 51, 1939 N.J. Misc. LEXIS 6 (N.J. Super. Ct. 1939).

Pincite

Opinion

❖ * * ❖ ❖ íjí #

1. The petitioner testified that she was a French teacher working at the Bidgefield Park school. On January 25th, 1938, somewhere around twelve-forty-five she fell on the sidewalk in front of the school steps. She testified that she had gone to lunch and upon her return from lunch had not yet reported to the school or entered the school building. She testified as to certain rules and regulations and requirements of teachers having to do with their responsibility for the conduct of school children going to and from school. She was presented with certain photographs but did not care to identify any of them as indicating the corner or place where the accident occurred. She further seemed to be unable to state what caused her to fall, that is whether it was by reason of the curb or sidewalk or the condition of the place where she was walking. It appears that the sidewalk in front of the school was concrete and except for that portion directly in front of the steps, has a grass plot on either side; a section of grass being between the inside edge of the walk and the [52]*52school building and the outside edge of the walk and the curb. She was presented with a statement which she admitted she signed and read and it appears at the time she made the statement she said she tripped on the sidewalk or curb at the southeast corner of Bergen avenue and Hobart street. At that time she stated that she was returning to the high school coming back from lunch when this occurred.

2. Certain exhibits were placed in evidence and the testimony of Mr. Theall, who interviewed the petitioner, was taken and two photographs were identified. This witness also testified that the southeast corner was across the street from the ' location of the school and that with respect to that corner where the school was located the distance from the steps of the school to the corner curb was a distance of approximately eighteen feet.

3. After consideration of the testimony adduced before me, having in mind the testimony of the petitioner and the previous statement made by her and having a chance to consider the manner in which her testimony was given, it is my opinion that we are dealing here with a case involving an injury occurring on a public sidewalk and occurring at. a time when the party involved was not in the course of her employment. In my opinion the petitioner was still in the act of returning from her lunch to go to the school where she was a French teacher. For some unknown reason she fell at or in close proximity to a corner near the school but upon the public sidewalk. In my opinion her accident was a result of a risk to which the public generally was subjected and not one to which she was peculiarly subjected as an employe of the Board of Education and I so find as a fact.

It is, therefore, * * * ordered, that the petition herein be dismissed and judgment entered in favor of the respondent.

John O. Wegner,

Deputy Commissioner.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

❖ * * ❖ ❖ íjí #

1. The petitioner testified that she was a French teacher working at the Bidgefield Park school. On January 25th, 1938, somewhere around twelve-forty-five she fell on the sidewalk in front of the school steps. She testified that she had gone to lunch and upon her return from lunch had not yet reported to the school or entered the school building. She testified as to certain rules and regulations and requirements of teachers having to do with their responsibility for the conduct of school children going to and from school. She was presented with certain photographs but did not care to identify any of them as indicating the corner or place where the accident occurred. She further seemed to be unable to state what caused her to fall, that is whether it was by reason of the curb or sidewalk or the condition of the place where she was walking. It appears that the sidewalk in front of the school was concrete and except for that portion directly in front of the steps, has a grass plot on either side; a section of grass being between the inside edge of the walk and the [52]*52school building and the outside edge of the walk and the curb. She was presented with a statement which she admitted she signed and read and it appears at the time she made the statement she said she tripped on the sidewalk or curb at the southeast corner of Bergen avenue and Hobart street. At that time she stated that she was returning to the high school coming back from lunch when this occurred.

2. Certain exhibits were placed in evidence and the testimony of Mr. Theall, who interviewed the petitioner, was taken and two photographs were identified. This witness also testified that the southeast corner was across the street from the ' location of the school and that with respect to that corner where the school was located the distance from the steps of the school to the corner curb was a distance of approximately eighteen feet.

3. After consideration of the testimony adduced before me, having in mind the testimony of the petitioner and the previous statement made by her and having a chance to consider the manner in which her testimony was given, it is my opinion that we are dealing here with a case involving an injury occurring on a public sidewalk and occurring at. a time when the party involved was not in the course of her employment. In my opinion the petitioner was still in the act of returning from her lunch to go to the school where she was a French teacher. For some unknown reason she fell at or in close proximity to a corner near the school but upon the public sidewalk. In my opinion her accident was a result of a risk to which the public generally was subjected and not one to which she was peculiarly subjected as an employe of the Board of Education and I so find as a fact.

It is, therefore, * * * ordered, that the petition herein be dismissed and judgment entered in favor of the respondent.

John O. Wegner,

Deputy Commissioner.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

4 A.2d 848, 17 N.J. Misc. 51, 1939 N.J. Misc. LEXIS 6, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/strahlendorff-v-board-of-education-njlaborcomp-1939.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack