Strahan v. Commonwealth
This text of 290 S.W.2d 40 (Strahan v. Commonwealth) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Kentucky primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
1 Appellant was indicted under subsection (2) of KRS 434.220. She was convicted and fined $100. A motion for appeal has' been filed.
It is urged that a demurrer should have been sustained to the indictment since the facts of the case indicated that the indictments should have been drawn under subsection (1) of the statute. The record does not contain a transcript of the evidence heard on the trial.
This indictment is properly drawn to conform to subsection (2). An appropriate instruction was given. In the absence of the proof introduced, it is presumed that the evidence sustained the conviction.
No error having been'found, the motion for appeal is overruled and the judgment is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
290 S.W.2d 40, 1956 Ky. LEXIS 307, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/strahan-v-commonwealth-kyctapp-1956.