Home/Supreme Court of North Carolina/Stradley v. . King

Stradley v. . King

86 N.C. 559
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Stradley v. . King. Read the opinion of the Court — 84 N.C. 635 →
Supreme Court of North Carolina·Decided February 5, 1882·Published

Opinion

84 N.C. page 637, line 3: The transcript upon which the court acted shows "that there was agreement" between purchaser and plaintiff, etc. After the publication of the reports the counsel interested caused a certified copy of the record to be sent up, and called attention to the omission of the word "no" in the said transcript — which should read "there was no agreement," etc.

*Page 1

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Stradley v. . King, 86 N.C. 559 (N.C. 1882).

86 N.C. 559 (Stradley v. . King) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.