Stradford v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Stradford v. State

837 S.W.2d 363, 1992 Mo. App. LEXIS 1417, 1992 WL 208581

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Stradford v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 1990 Mo. App. LEXIS 465 →

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided September 1, 1992·No. No. 60922·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Movant appeals from the denial of his rule 24.035 motion without an evidentiary hearing. We affirm. The findings and conclusions of the motion court are not clearly erroneous, and an extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only setting forth the reasons for our order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Movant appeals from the denial of his rule 24.035 motion without an evidentiary hearing. We affirm. The findings and conclusions of the motion court are not clearly erroneous, and an extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only setting forth the reasons for our order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Stradford v. State, 837 S.W.2d 363, 1992 Mo. App. LEXIS 1417, 1992 WL 208581 (Mo. Ct. App. 1992).

Pincite

837 S.W.2d 363 (Stradford v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.