Strader v. Wing

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Strader v. Wing

275 A.D.2d 884, 714 N.Y.S.2d 921, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9576

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedSeptember 29, 2000

StatusPublished

This text of 275 A.D.2d 884 (Strader v. Wing) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Strader v. Wing, 275 A.D.2d 884, 714 N.Y.S.2d 921, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9576 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2000).

Pincite

Opinion

—Determination unanimously confirmed without costs and petition dismissed. Memorandum: In this "CPLR article 78 proceeding transferred to our Court (see, CPLR 7804 [g]), petitioner contends that the determination following a fair hearing to terminate her personal care services is not supported by substantial evidence. We disagree. The evidence adduced at the fair hearing establishes that petitioner’s health and safety in a home setting could no longer be assured (see, Matter of Bentley v Perales, 103 AD2d 1005). We have examined petitioner’s remaining contentions and conclude that they lack [885]*885merit. (CPLR art 78 Proceeding Transferred by Order of Supreme Court, Lewis County, Gilbert, J.) Present — Pigott, Jr., P. J., Hayes, Wisner, Scudder and Balio, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Determination unanimously confirmed without costs and petition dismissed. Memorandum: In this "CPLR article 78 proceeding transferred to our Court (see, CPLR 7804 [g]), petitioner contends that the determination following a fair hearing to terminate her personal care services is not supported by substantial evidence. We disagree. The evidence adduced at the fair hearing establishes that petitioner’s health and safety in a home setting could no longer be assured (see, Matter of Bentley v Perales, 103 AD2d 1005). We have examined petitioner’s remaining contentions and conclude that they lack [885]*885merit. (CPLR art 78 Proceeding Transferred by Order of Supreme Court, Lewis County, Gilbert, J.) Present — Pigott, Jr., P. J., Hayes, Wisner, Scudder and Balio, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

275 A.D.2d 884, 714 N.Y.S.2d 921, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9576, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/strader-v-wing-nyappdiv-2000.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack