Strader v. Grothe

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Strader v. Grothe

198 So. 3d 22, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 11680

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedAugust 5, 2015

DocketNo. 2D13-3776

StatusPublished

This text of 198 So. 3d 22 (Strader v. Grothe) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Strader v. Grothe, 198 So. 3d 22, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 11680 (Fla. Ct. App. 2015).

Pincite

Opinion

LaROSE, Judge.

Daniel Strader appeals the trial court’s nonfinal order summarily denying his renewed motion for relief from an August 4, 2010, order of dismissal or closing for lack of prosecution. See Fla. R. Civ. P. 1.540(b). The appendix submitted with the initial brief is insufficient for this court to determine the underlying facts in this case. Consequently, we affirm the trial court’s order.

Affirmed.

KHOUZAM and CRENSHAW, JJ., Concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

LaROSE, Judge.

Daniel Strader appeals the trial court’s nonfinal order summarily denying his renewed motion for relief from an August 4, 2010, order of dismissal or closing for lack of prosecution. See Fla. R. Civ. P. 1.540(b). The appendix submitted with the initial brief is insufficient for this court to determine the underlying facts in this case. Consequently, we affirm the trial court’s order.

Affirmed.

KHOUZAM and CRENSHAW, JJ., Concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

198 So. 3d 22, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 11680, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/strader-v-grothe-fladistctapp-2015.