Strader v. Board of Chosen Freeholders of Sussex County

15 N.J.L. 433
Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided September 15, 1836·Published

Opinion

By the Court.

The rule must be made absolute. The court instead of dismissing the appeal, ought to have continued the cause and ordered a re-hearing. The effect of dismissing the appeal was not only to subject the appellant to the payment of costs, but to leave in full force, and thus in effect to affirm a judgment, from which the party had regularly appealed, without any decision on the merits of his case. Under the provisions of our statutes upon this subject, a regular appeal from the judgment of a court for the trial of small causes, effectually suspends, or rather supersedes that judgment; and the Court of Common Pleas must re-try the cause upon the merits, and give such judgment as the court below ought to have given.

Cited in Rodenbury v. Rosebury, 4 Zab. 493.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Strader v. Board of Chosen Freeholders of Sussex County, 15 N.J.L. 433 (N.J. 1836).

15 N.J.L. 433 (Strader v. Board of Chosen Freeholders of Sussex County) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.