Strader v. Board of Chosen Freeholders of Sussex County
This text of 15 N.J.L. 433 (Strader v. Board of Chosen Freeholders of Sussex County) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The rule must be made absolute. The court instead of dismissing the appeal, ought to have continued the cause and ordered a re-hearing. The effect of dismissing the appeal was not only to subject the appellant to the payment of costs, but to leave in full force, and thus in effect to affirm a judgment, from which the party had regularly appealed, without any decision on the merits of his case. Under the provisions of our statutes upon this subject, a regular appeal from the judgment of a court for the trial of small causes, effectually suspends, or rather supersedes that judgment; and the Court of Common Pleas must re-try the cause upon the merits, and give such judgment as the court below ought to have given.
Cited in Rodenbury v. Rosebury, 4 Zab. 493.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
15 N.J.L. 433, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/strader-v-board-of-chosen-freeholders-of-sussex-county-nj-1836.