Strader (ID 66677) v. Kansas, State of

District Court, D. Kansas·Decided April 11, 2022·No. 5:22-cv-03054·Unknown

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS

JAMES C. STRADER,

Plaintiff,

v. CASE NO. 22-3054-SAC

STATE OF KANSAS, et al.,

Defendants.

O R D E R Plaintiff, James C. Strader, who is currently incarcerated at the Lansing Correctional Facility in Lansing, Kansas, brings this pro se civil rights case. The Court entered an Order (Doc. 7) denying Plaintiff’s motions for leave to proceed in forma pauperis, finding Plaintiff is subject to the “three-strikes” provision under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). The Court examined the Complaint and attachments and found no showing of imminent danger of serious physical injury. The Court also granted Plaintiff until April 8, 2022, to submit the $402.00 filing fee. The Court’s order provided that “[t]he failure to submit the fee by that date will result in the dismissal of this matter without prejudice and without additional prior notice.” (Doc. 7, at 3.) Plaintiff has failed to pay the filing fee by the deadline set forth in the order. Rule 41(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure “authorizes a district court, upon a defendant’s motion, to order the dismissal of an action for failure to prosecute or for failure to comply with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure or ‘a court order.’” Young v. U.S., 316 F. App’x 764, 771 (10th Cir. 2009) (citing Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b)). “This rule has been interpreted as permitting district courts to dismiss actions sua sponte when one of these conditions is met.” Id. (citing Link v. Wabash R.R. Co., 370 U.S. 626, 630–31 (1962); Olsen v. Mapes, 333 F.3d 1199, 1204 n.3 (10th Cir. 2003)). “In addition, it is well established in this circuit that a district court is not obligated to follow any particular procedures when dismissing an action without prejudice under Rule 41(b).” Young, 316 F. App’x at 771–72 (citations omitted). The time in which Plaintiff was required to submit the filing fee has passed. As a consequence, the Court dismisses this action without prejudice pursuant to Rule 41(b) for failure

to comply with court orders. IT IS THEREFORE BY THE COURT ORDERED that this action is dismissed without prejudice pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated April 11, 2022, in Topeka, Kansas.

s/ Sam A. Crow SAM A. CROW U. S. Senior District Judge

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Strader (ID 66677) v. Kansas, State of, (D. Kan. 2022).

Strader (ID 66677) v. Kansas, State of (Strader (ID 66677) v. Kansas, State of) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Link v. Wabash Railroad
370 U.S. 626 (Supreme Court, 1962)
Olsen v. Mapes
333 F.3d 1199 (Tenth Circuit, 2003)
Young v. United States
316 F. App'x 764 (Tenth Circuit, 2009)