Stracke v. Farquar

California Supreme Court

Stracke v. Farquar

20 Cal. 2d 82

CourtCalifornia Supreme Court

DecidedMarch 31, 1942

DocketS. F. No. 16737

StatusPublished

This text of 20 Cal. 2d 82 (Stracke v. Farquar) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Stracke v. Farquar, 20 Cal. 2d 82 (Cal. 1942).

Pincite

Opinion

THE COURT.

The petition for a peremptory writ of mandamus to compel the respondent, as City Clerk of Santa Rosa, to omit the names of seven persons as candidates for the office of councilman from the ballot to be used at the municipal election to be held April 7, was denied in the exercise of the discretion of the court for the reason that it appeared from the answer and stipulation of the parties that the ballot already had been printed and distributed to certain voters. Such denial should not be taken or understood as an adjudication in any way of the questions of law presented by the petition.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

THE COURT.

The petition for a peremptory writ of mandamus to compel the respondent, as City Clerk of Santa Rosa, to omit the names of seven persons as candidates for the office of councilman from the ballot to be used at the municipal election to be held April 7, was denied in the exercise of the discretion of the court for the reason that it appeared from the answer and stipulation of the parties that the ballot already had been printed and distributed to certain voters. Such denial should not be taken or understood as an adjudication in any way of the questions of law presented by the petition.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

20 Cal. 2d 82, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stracke-v-farquar-cal-1942.