Strachan v. State

578 So. 2d 511, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 3912, 1991 WL 65963
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedApril 30, 1991
DocketNo. 90-1866
StatusPublished

This text of 578 So. 2d 511 (Strachan v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Strachan v. State, 578 So. 2d 511, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 3912, 1991 WL 65963 (Fla. Ct. App. 1991).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Theodore Strachan appeals his conviction for trafficking in cocaine. He argues that the trial court should have granted his motion to suppress the cocaine and its wrappings. The defendant had left the cocaine outside his apartment, in an open area in which he had no expectation of privacy. The officer observed it, seized it, and properly obtained a search warrant for the apartment. The motion to suppress was correctly denied. See, e.g., State v. Nittolo, 317 So.2d 748, 749-50 (Fla.), cert. denied sub nom. Hover v. Florida, 423 U.S. 1036, 96 S.Ct. 572, 46 L.Ed.2d 411 (1975); State v. Oliver, 368 So.2d 1331, 1335 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979), cert. dismissed, 383 So.2d 1200 (Fla.1980).

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Nittolo
317 So. 2d 748 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1975)
State v. Oliver
368 So. 2d 1331 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1979)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
578 So. 2d 511, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 3912, 1991 WL 65963, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/strachan-v-state-fladistctapp-1991.