Strachan v. State

578 So. 2d 511, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 3912, 1991 WL 65963
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided April 30, 1991·No. No. 90-1866·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Theodore Strachan appeals his conviction for trafficking in cocaine. He argues that the trial court should have granted his motion to suppress the cocaine and its wrappings. The defendant had left the cocaine outside his apartment, in an open area in which he had no expectation of privacy. The officer observed it, seized it, and properly obtained a search warrant for the apartment. The motion to suppress was correctly denied. See, e.g., State v. Nittolo, 317 So.2d 748, 749-50 (Fla.), cert. denied sub nom. Hover v. Florida, 423 U.S. 1036, 96 S.Ct. 572, 46 L.Ed.2d 411 (1975); State v. Oliver, 368 So.2d 1331, 1335 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979), cert. dismissed, 383 So.2d 1200 (Fla.1980).

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Strachan v. State, 578 So. 2d 511, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 3912, 1991 WL 65963 (Fla. Ct. App. 1991).

578 So. 2d 511 (Strachan v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Nittolo
317 So. 2d 748 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1975)
State v. Oliver
368 So. 2d 1331 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1979)