Stowers v. State

504 So. 2d 67, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 863, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 7438
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided March 27, 1987·No. No. BL-106·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant’s convictions and sentences for two counts of robbery with a firearm, three counts of forgery and two counts of uttering a forged instrument are affirmed. Brown v. State, 502 So.2d 979 (Fla. 1st DCA 1987) (and cases cited therein); Andre v. State, 431 So.2d 1042 (Fla. 5th DCA 1983); Brown v. State, 397 So.2d 1153 (Fla. 5th DCA 1981); McCloud v. State, 335 So.2d 257 (Fla.1976); and Hedges v. State, 172 So.2d 824 (Fla.1965). We again certify the question set out in VanTassell v. State, 498 So.2d 649 (Fla. 1st DCA 1986), to the Florida Supreme Court as a question of great public importance.

AFFIRMED.

SMITH, BARFIELD and JOANOS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Stowers v. State, 504 So. 2d 67, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 863, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 7438 (Fla. Ct. App. 1987).

504 So. 2d 67 (Stowers v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Stowers v. State
541 So. 2d 715 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1989)
Stowers v. State
534 So. 2d 1143 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1988)
Gill v. Gill
504 So. 2d 67 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1987)