Stowe v. Hopper

Supreme Court of Georgia

Stowe v. Hopper

231 S.E.2d 736, 238 Ga. 139, 1977 Ga. LEXIS 926

CourtSupreme Court of Georgia

DecidedJanuary 4, 1977

Docket31702

StatusPublished

This text of 231 S.E.2d 736 (Stowe v. Hopper) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Stowe v. Hopper, 231 S.E.2d 736, 238 Ga. 139, 1977 Ga. LEXIS 926 (Ga. 1977).

Pincite

Opinion

Undercofler, Presiding Justice.

Petitioner Reggie Stowe seeks habeas corpus relief from a life sentence received on a guilty plea to an [140]*140indictment for murder on the ground of ineffective assistance of counsel. The trial court denied his pro se petition. We granted his pro se application for appeal and reverse.

Submitted November 19, 1976 — Decided January 4, 1977. Reggie W. Stowe, pro se. Arthur K. Bolton, Attorney General, for appellee.

When the petitioner was indicted and arrested for murder, he had escaped from Central State Hospital, where he had been confined after having been found not guilty of another crime by reason of insanity. His appointed counsel was informed of this fact by both the petitioner and his brother on October 7, 1972, when his counsel first interviewed him. The petitioner appeared for arraignment, without his counsel on October 9, 1972, where he claims he made an oral motion for a special plea and psychiatric examination, which was not ruled on by the trial court. The following day after a short conference with his counsel, he pleaded guilty to murder.

We hold, on these facts, that petitioner’s counsel rendered ineffective assistance in violation of petitioner’s constitutional rights. We, therefore, find that the habeas court erred in remanding the petitioner to custody without ordering a new trial.

Judgment reversed.

All the Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Undercofler, Presiding Justice.

Petitioner Reggie Stowe seeks habeas corpus relief from a life sentence received on a guilty plea to an [140]*140indictment for murder on the ground of ineffective assistance of counsel. The trial court denied his pro se petition. We granted his pro se application for appeal and reverse.

Submitted November 19, 1976 — Decided January 4, 1977. Reggie W. Stowe, pro se. Arthur K. Bolton, Attorney General, for appellee.

When the petitioner was indicted and arrested for murder, he had escaped from Central State Hospital, where he had been confined after having been found not guilty of another crime by reason of insanity. His appointed counsel was informed of this fact by both the petitioner and his brother on October 7, 1972, when his counsel first interviewed him. The petitioner appeared for arraignment, without his counsel on October 9, 1972, where he claims he made an oral motion for a special plea and psychiatric examination, which was not ruled on by the trial court. The following day after a short conference with his counsel, he pleaded guilty to murder.

We hold, on these facts, that petitioner’s counsel rendered ineffective assistance in violation of petitioner’s constitutional rights. We, therefore, find that the habeas court erred in remanding the petitioner to custody without ordering a new trial.

Judgment reversed.

All the Justices concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

231 S.E.2d 736, 238 Ga. 139, 1977 Ga. LEXIS 926, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stowe-v-hopper-ga-1977.