Stowe v. City of Elmira
This text of 291 N.E.2d 586 (Stowe v. City of Elmira) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order affirmed, without costs, in the following memorandum: The Court of Appeals will not review the Appellate Division’s exercise of sound discretion to grant or deny an application to file a late notice of claim under section 50-e of the General Municipal Law (see Matter of Murray v. City of New York, 30 N Y 2d 113; Matter of Biberias v. New York City Tr. Auth., 27 N Y 2d 890).
Concur: Chief Judge Fuld and Judges Burke, Scileppi, Bergan, Breitel, Jasen and Gibson.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
291 N.E.2d 586, 31 N.Y.2d 814, 339 N.Y.S.2d 463, 1972 N.Y. LEXIS 978, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stowe-v-city-of-elmira-ny-1972.