Stow v. Lillie

63 Ala. 257
Supreme Court of Alabama·Decided December 15, 1879·Published·Cited by 6 cases

Opinion

MANNING, J.

We are not able to perceive any material' difference between this case and that of Shulman, Goetter & Weil v. Boyle (59 Ala. 566). The debt, to satisfy which the property in controversy was sold, had its origin in 1873, and was reduced to judgment in 1874. The house and lot of land were leased to a third person for the year 1875, and after-wards, in such a manner that they were not and could not be occupied, during that time, as the homestead of the debtor or his family; and without being such homestead, the property was not exempt from execution. The act of February 9th, 1877, not having been then passed, the case is not brought within its 26th section, carried into the Code of 1876, as section 2843. .

Let the judgment of the Circuit Court be reversed, and the cause be remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Stow v. Lillie, 63 Ala. 257 (Ala. 1879).

63 Ala. 257 (Stow v. Lillie) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Tharp v. Johnson
122 So. 668 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1929)
Smith Lumber Co. v. Garry
80 So. 857 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1919)
Fuller v. American Supply Co.
64 So. 549 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1914)
Scaife v. Argall
74 Ala. 473 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1883)
Murphy v. Hunt, Miller & Co.
75 Ala. 438 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1883)
Lehman, Durr & Co. v. Bryan
67 Ala. 558 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1880)