Stow v. Lillie
This text of 63 Ala. 257 (Stow v. Lillie) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
We are not able to perceive any material' difference between this case and that of Shulman, Goetter & Weil v. Boyle (59 Ala. 566). The debt, to satisfy which the property in controversy was sold, had its origin in 1873, and was reduced to judgment in 1874. The house and lot of land were leased to a third person for the year 1875, and after-wards, in such a manner that they were not and could not be occupied, during that time, as the homestead of the debtor or his family; and without being such homestead, the property was not exempt from execution. The act of February 9th, 1877, not having been then passed, the case is not brought within its 26th section, carried into the Code of 1876, as section 2843. .
Let the judgment of the Circuit Court be reversed, and the cause be remanded.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
63 Ala. 257, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stow-v-lillie-ala-1879.