Stover v. State

136 S.E.2d 743, 220 Ga. 17, 1964 Ga. LEXIS 435
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedMay 7, 1964
Docket22441
StatusPublished

This text of 136 S.E.2d 743 (Stover v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Stover v. State, 136 S.E.2d 743, 220 Ga. 17, 1964 Ga. LEXIS 435 (Ga. 1964).

Opinion

Mobley, Justice.

E. R. Stover brought his petition for writ of habeas corpus alleging that he was being illegally detained by the Sheriff of Fulton County; that the detention “is due to a telegram from the Board of Corrections for the State of Alabama, and warrant for petitioner's arrest”; and that “petitioner shows that he has been incarcerated in said Fulton County jail since the 4th day of January 1964, to date, and no formal demand has been made by the Governor of Alabama to extradite petitioner. Therefore, petitioner has been and is incarcerated in violation of Section 44-304 of the Georgia Code Annotated in that he has been confined more than 20 days and, further, more than 5 days after said 20 days if affidavit has been submitted.” The record before this court contains only the petition and order of the trial court reading as follows: “Upon consideration of the foregoing petition and writ, and after evidence heard, the writ is denied and the petitioner is remanded to the custody of the respondent.” Reid:

Without the evidence, which was not brought up to this court, it is impossible for this court to determine whether the respondent was being illegally detained; thus, the judgment of the trial court must be affirmed. Scott v. Wage-Earners Loan &c. Co., 147 Ga. 576 (2) (94 SE 1021); Town of Fairburn v. Edmondson, 160 Ga. 792 (129 SE 108); Federal Investment Co. v. Ewing, 165 Ga. 435 (141 SE 65).

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur. Submitted April 14, 1964 Decided May 7, 1964. Atkins & Atkins, Ben S. Atkins, for plaintiff in error. William T. Boyd, Solicitor General, Loy W. Milam, J. Walter LeCraw, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Scott v. Wage Earners Loan & Investment Co.
94 S.E. 1021 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1918)
Town of Fairburn v. Edmondson
129 S.E. 108 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1925)
Federal Investment Co. v. Ewing
141 S.E. 65 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1927)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
136 S.E.2d 743, 220 Ga. 17, 1964 Ga. LEXIS 435, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stover-v-state-ga-1964.